Let me state from the outset that I’ve never owned an iPhone that arrived in defective condition or developed a defect after heavy use. Unless heavily abused, I expect them to last a fairly long time, other than, of course, the battery. But since most of you probably swap your mobile phones every couple of years anyway, maybe longevity isn’t a deciding factor.

While I realize some of you keep your handheld gadgets in pocket or purse without the safety net provided by some sort of case, I’m sure loads of those accessories are sold. A number of manufacturers are involved in that business, and each of them provide a rich selection of cases and screen coverings.

In light of the report that Apple may be cutting out screen protectors from their retail outlets because they create their own complications if not fitted properly, I got to thinking of my recent efforts to get a slim, secure case with a belt holster, and there aren’t too many of those configurations around.

Continue Reading...

Related Articles:

• Reviewing Products They’ve Never Used
• Will the 2015 Mac be a Mac?
• Apple Continues to Make Money Hand Over Fist
• The Myths About Apple Keep on Coming
• More Uncritical Media Assumptions

Unlike many tech companies, Apple has a long-range vision. Maybe you didn’t see how the iPod would develop, the ongoing improvements in the iPhone or the path from Mac OS X 10.0 to 10.6, but there’s little doubt Apple had broad concepts about the direction of these products from Day One.

I wasn’t surprised when I learned that there was a program to develop a version of Mac OS X for Intel processors years before Steve Jobs announced the switchover at a WWDC. Sure it had only been rumored for quite some time, but a responsible company would always keep the options open, and Jobs was quoted as saying just that when questioned about the future of the PowerPC.

Of course, the tech press generally doesn’t have a concept of long-range goals, although one recent article outlined the substantial but incremental changes you see in each generation of an Apple product. But you don’t see the end game until you take a look at the entire picture after several years have passed. Then a smile comes to your lips.

Continue Reading...

Related Articles:

• So is the Mac at Death’s Door?
• So Will Apple/Google Dwarf Apple/Microsoft?
• Memo to Google: It’s About the Applications, Stupid!
• The Enemy of My Enemy Revisited
• The iTunes Profit Myth

In recent years, it was widely assumed that Apple and Google were working together to combat Microsoft. That may have been true at one point in time, but a lot of things have since occurred hat have put Apple at Google at loggerheads.

The most recent salvo in this growing conflict was that intellectual property lawsuit against HTC, a Taiwan-based mobile phone manufacturer. The action, involving 20 Apple patents that they claim have been violated, is regarded as an action really targeted at Google. So HTC is supposedly the proxy.

Now that may, in part, be true, but one fact frequently overlooked is the fact that some of the devices mentioned in Apple’s complaint use the Windows Mobile OS. So what does Google have to do with that?

More to the point, one key reason for Apple to go after HTC is because that company appears to be the largest maker of Android devices. I suspect Apple’s attorneys have reasoned that, without being installed on any devices, Android would be nothing more than an idea, not a source of infringement. It’s only when it’s actually used on a shipping product that the issue arises.

Continue Reading...

Related Articles:

• The Myths About Apple Keep on Coming
• So Will Apple/Google Dwarf Apple/Microsoft?
• Will the 2015 Mac be a Mac?
• Does Windows 7 Make a Difference?
• Should Microsoft Dump Internet Explorer?

Sometimes I feel that I’m becoming the tech equivalent of the Media Matters Web site. That’s the one where they analyze what they regard as erroneous reports from their opponents. Since they have a liberal orientation, that means anyone with a conservative bent; their biggest target is Fox News.

But I have no political agendas to advance. I’m just interested in reading responsible and informed commentary and news about my favorite subjects. Contrary opinions don’t bother me, so long as they are based on logic and reason and not knee-jerk reactions to something that hits the wrong emotional nerve.

Unfortunately, far too many news sources, particularly the online variety, seek hits and ad revenues above everything, and the facts be damned! Combine that with the terrible proliferation of lazy research, where it doesn’t seem they are even doing a basic Google search, and you understand why such much misinformation passes muster.

I’m also deeply concerned about the fact that some of the sources quoted in these stories have their own overt agendas that make anything they say suspect. Unfortunately, what they say is taken as near-gospel anyway.

Continue Reading…

Related Articles:

• Will the 2015 Mac be a Mac?
• Reviewing Products They’ve Never Used
• The Search Engine Report: Hey Apple, Why Not More Choices?
• Apple’s Not-So-Secret Plot to Change Technology Standards
• The Enemy of My Enemy Revisited