<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Apple Hardware Report: No More New Macs for 2008!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technightowl.com/2008/11/the-apple-hardware-report-no-more-new-macs-for-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technightowl.com/2008/11/the-apple-hardware-report-no-more-new-macs-for-2008/</link>
	<description>Tech Commentaries From Best-Selllng Author Gene Steinberg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:25:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://www.technightowl.com/2008/11/the-apple-hardware-report-no-more-new-macs-for-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-13065</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macnightowl.com/?p=2045#comment-13065</guid>
		<description>Sounds to me like Apple is saying to the market, &quot;Buy what&#039;s on the shelves, we&#039;ll make more, but not in time for the holidays&quot;.

More or less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <img src='http://www.technightowl.com/wp-content/plugins/useragent-spy/img/16/net/firefox.png' title='Firefox 3.0.3' style='border:0px;' alt='Firefox 3.0.3'/> <a href='http://mozilla.org' title='Firefox 3.0.3' rel='nofollow'>Firefox 3.0.3</a>  <img src='http://www.technightowl.com/wp-content/plugins/useragent-spy/img/16/os/win.png' title='Windows XP' style='border:0px;' alt='Windows XP'/> Windows XP<p>Sounds to me like Apple is saying to the market, &#8220;Buy what&#8217;s on the shelves, we&#8217;ll make more, but not in time for the holidays&#8221;.</p>
<p>More or less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: javaholic</title>
		<link>http://www.technightowl.com/2008/11/the-apple-hardware-report-no-more-new-macs-for-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-13040</link>
		<dc:creator>javaholic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macnightowl.com/?p=2045#comment-13040</guid>
		<description>Interesting to see Apple being a little more vocal regarding hardware updates. I guess that’s one way of quietening down expectations and rumours. Still, it’d be nice to at least see an industrial design update of the MacPro and Mini. They’re about the only 2 major Apple hardware updates left that aren’t silver, black and glossy.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <img src='http://www.technightowl.com/wp-content/plugins/useragent-spy/img/16/net/camino.png' title='Camino 1.6.4' style='border:0px;' alt='Camino 1.6.4'/> <a href='http://caminobrowser.org/' title='Camino 1.6.4' rel='nofollow'>Camino 1.6.4</a>  <img src='http://www.technightowl.com/wp-content/plugins/useragent-spy/img/16/os/mac.png' title='Mac OS' style='border:0px;' alt='Mac OS'/> Mac OS <p>Interesting to see Apple being a little more vocal regarding hardware updates. I guess that’s one way of quietening down expectations and rumours. Still, it’d be nice to at least see an industrial design update of the MacPro and Mini. They’re about the only 2 major Apple hardware updates left that aren’t silver, black and glossy.  <img src='http://www.technightowl.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Steinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.technightowl.com/2008/11/the-apple-hardware-report-no-more-new-macs-for-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-13039</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Steinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macnightowl.com/?p=2045#comment-13039</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Dave Barnes&lt;/b&gt; wrote:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Give me an iMac that supports 8GB of memory and my credit card will be in action.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If they are going to use the same guts as the MacBook Pro, it&#039;ll be 6GB, max. But who knows?

Peace,
Gene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <img src='http://www.technightowl.com/wp-content/plugins/useragent-spy/img/16/net/safari.png' title='Safari 525.20.1' style='border:0px;' alt='Safari 525.20.1'/> <a href='http://www.apple.com/safari/' title='Safari 525.20.1' rel='nofollow'>Safari 525.20.1</a>  <img src='http://www.technightowl.com/wp-content/plugins/useragent-spy/img/16/os/mac.png' title='Mac OS' style='border:0px;' alt='Mac OS'/> Mac OS <p><b>Dave Barnes</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Give me an iMac that supports 8GB of memory and my credit card will be in action.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If they are going to use the same guts as the MacBook Pro, it&#8217;ll be 6GB, max. But who knows?</p>
<p>Peace,<br />
Gene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Barnes</title>
		<link>http://www.technightowl.com/2008/11/the-apple-hardware-report-no-more-new-macs-for-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-13037</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macnightowl.com/?p=2045#comment-13037</guid>
		<description>Give me an iMac that supports 8GB of memory and my credit card will be in action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <img src='http://www.technightowl.com/wp-content/plugins/useragent-spy/img/16/net/firefox.png' title='Firefox 3.0.3' style='border:0px;' alt='Firefox 3.0.3'/> <a href='http://mozilla.org' title='Firefox 3.0.3' rel='nofollow'>Firefox 3.0.3</a>  <img src='http://www.technightowl.com/wp-content/plugins/useragent-spy/img/16/os/mac.png' title='Mac OS' style='border:0px;' alt='Mac OS'/> Mac OS <p>Give me an iMac that supports 8GB of memory and my credit card will be in action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjteix</title>
		<link>http://www.technightowl.com/2008/11/the-apple-hardware-report-no-more-new-macs-for-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-13036</link>
		<dc:creator>mjteix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macnightowl.com/?p=2045#comment-13036</guid>
		<description>iMac:
I would believe that the big change will be LED-BL displays, because in terms of cpu, there&#039;s not much to upgrade to from Intel (unless they start using quad-core cpus). Given that the new 24&quot; LED-BL Cinema Display is not yet available it&#039;s a sign that the new iMacs were not ready to ship, and will not before 2009.

Mac mini: 
Could be updated to MacBook specs if Apple wanted it to survive another year, probably they are focusing on notebook manufacturing for the holiday &quot;quarter&quot; and when the new parts (nvidia chipset) are largely available, they will probably release the new Mac mini (if they choose to keep the model).

Mac Pro: 
Last time I&#039;ve checked, the Xeon parts will not be available before early 2009, so that could explain the perceived &quot;delay&quot;. All the press about nehalem lately is for the Core i7 which is a high-end desktop cpu (a nice one) but Apple will probably keep using Xeons on the Mac Pro...

On the positive side, MWSF will probably be about the Mac this time (updated desktops, other displays?, Snow Leopard preview, iLife/iWork &#039;09?). Of course, there will be talks about the iPhone/iPod, and probably an update for AppleTV too. But, will there be a &quot;one more thing&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <img src='http://www.technightowl.com/wp-content/plugins/useragent-spy/img/16/net/safari.png' title='Safari 525.22' style='border:0px;' alt='Safari 525.22'/> <a href='http://www.apple.com/safari/' title='Safari 525.22' rel='nofollow'>Safari 525.22</a>  <img src='http://www.technightowl.com/wp-content/plugins/useragent-spy/img/16/os/mac.png' title='Mac OS' style='border:0px;' alt='Mac OS'/> Mac OS <p>iMac:<br />
I would believe that the big change will be LED-BL displays, because in terms of cpu, there&#8217;s not much to upgrade to from Intel (unless they start using quad-core cpus). Given that the new 24&#8243; LED-BL Cinema Display is not yet available it&#8217;s a sign that the new iMacs were not ready to ship, and will not before 2009.</p>
<p>Mac mini:<br />
Could be updated to MacBook specs if Apple wanted it to survive another year, probably they are focusing on notebook manufacturing for the holiday &#8220;quarter&#8221; and when the new parts (nvidia chipset) are largely available, they will probably release the new Mac mini (if they choose to keep the model).</p>
<p>Mac Pro:<br />
Last time I&#8217;ve checked, the Xeon parts will not be available before early 2009, so that could explain the perceived &#8220;delay&#8221;. All the press about nehalem lately is for the Core i7 which is a high-end desktop cpu (a nice one) but Apple will probably keep using Xeons on the Mac Pro&#8230;</p>
<p>On the positive side, MWSF will probably be about the Mac this time (updated desktops, other displays?, Snow Leopard preview, iLife/iWork &#8216;09?). Of course, there will be talks about the iPhone/iPod, and probably an update for AppleTV too. But, will there be a &#8220;one more thing&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.technightowl.com/2008/11/the-apple-hardware-report-no-more-new-macs-for-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-13033</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 02:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macnightowl.com/?p=2045#comment-13033</guid>
		<description>Apple doesn&#039;t really sell on specification anyway, so a lack of desktop updates won&#039;t really matter that much.  I would imagine that most people buy a new Mac because their old one just doesn&#039;t do it for them anymore, or to escape from Windows, and the performance differences between the current iMac and the last of the white ones is so minor, and the aluminum model so new, that a mere non-press-release speedbump is much more likely than any new model, and actually makes more sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <img src='http://www.technightowl.com/wp-content/plugins/useragent-spy/img/16/net/firefox.png' title='Firefox 3.0.3' style='border:0px;' alt='Firefox 3.0.3'/> <a href='http://mozilla.org' title='Firefox 3.0.3' rel='nofollow'>Firefox 3.0.3</a>  <img src='http://www.technightowl.com/wp-content/plugins/useragent-spy/img/16/os/mac.png' title='Mac OS' style='border:0px;' alt='Mac OS'/> Mac OS <p>Apple doesn&#8217;t really sell on specification anyway, so a lack of desktop updates won&#8217;t really matter that much.  I would imagine that most people buy a new Mac because their old one just doesn&#8217;t do it for them anymore, or to escape from Windows, and the performance differences between the current iMac and the last of the white ones is so minor, and the aluminum model so new, that a mere non-press-release speedbump is much more likely than any new model, and actually makes more sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
