Visit the all-new Tech Night Owl Store
  • Explore the magic and the mystery!
  • The Tech Night Owl's Home Page
  • Visit the all-new Tech Night Owl Store
    Namecheap.com





  • The Leopard Report: Will Boot Camp Change?

    April 3rd, 2007

    We know two things about Leopard. One is that it is still supposedly on track for delivery later this spring. The second is that it’ll contain the final version of Boot Camp, which, as the title implies, allows you to run Windows on your Mac in a dual-boot situation.

    Despite the obvious facts, it’s sad to see how often the basics are messed up by people who should know better. So as we sit in this period where new information is lacking, let me bring you all up to date with a few new slants where appropriate.

    First of all, of course, is where Boot Camp is heading. Now its very name, using the word “Boot,” clearly defines its purpose, which is why I wonder about the folks who seem to feel that Apple is heading towards a virtual machine solution, one that doesn’t require a reboot, to compete with Parallels Desktop and VMWare Fusion.

    Of course, some also felt quite recently that Apple planned to delay Leopard to provide Windows Vista compatibility, but since that shortcoming was taken care of last week — officially — and unofficial solutions were previously available, that theory has fallen by the wayside. In addition, Apple has said that they didn’t intend to enter into the virtual machine marketplace, since that was already well-served, and that Boot Camp would remain a dual-boot solution under Leopard.

    To be fair, Apple is also notorious for saying something one day, and changing its corporate mind the next. The Mac mini is a great example, where their financial team once claimed that Apple didn’t plan on entering the low-cost PC arena and did just that a few months later.

    On the other hand, I fail to see the logic in changing the goals of Boot Camp. Remember, this is just an accommodation for Windows users switching to the Mac, who need a lifeline to run Windows software, particularly if there’s no Mac equivalent. Gamers who can’t find Mac versions of their favorite titles, or who suffer from inferior performance when they are available, also benefit.

    Sure, nothing has stopped Apple from supplanting third parties when they felt they could do a better job. But Parallels Desktop has all the Mac interface goodies, and VMWare is a huge, smart company that will no doubt also deliver a credible Mac virtualization solution when their work is done later this year. In other words, Apple’s intervention here isn’t necessary. Boot Camp is fine for what it does, and simply making its use more and more seamless ought to be sufficient.

    So when you learn the final feature-set of Leopard — and I expect that’ll happen in a matter of a few weeks at most — you won’t be surprised as to what Boot Camp will do. The only real changes that I expect are full support for Time Machine, and possibly an easier route to dual-booting, but that’s about the size of it.

    But what about Boot Camp for Tiger? Will it still be supported? Well, officially, it’s a public beta, and as solid as it might be, Apple can certainly leave it be, or do minor updates from time to time to deliver improved drivers or fix bugs. Some have suggested, though, that Boot Camp will be unbundled for Mac users who don’t upgrade to Leopard, and the final version will carry a modest price tag, say $29.99, same as QuickTime Pro.

    Why not make it free? Well, that’s a good question. I dare say, though, that the hundreds of thousands of Mac users who presently run Boot Camp may not feel a compelling reason to buy a gussied up retail version.

    In the end, though, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Boot Camp simply remain the public beta that it is today. I cannot see a compelling reason to make more than minor changes to it, and only a drastic alteration or improvement would convince many people to pay for it.

    Remember, too, that Boot Camp is not simply something that can just expire. It’s basically a Setup Assistant that lets you install Windows on an Intel-based Mac, along with a package of drivers to support Apple’s hardware. That’s the beginning and end of it, so there’s really no feasible way for it to stop working on existing installations, unless the drivers have a time bomb in them that would prevent them from functioning, and that’s highly improbable.

    I suppose the Setup Assistant itself could stop working, but that hardly makes sense either.

    So for all the speculation you’ll hear between now and the final announcement of Leopard’s features and shipping date, I don’t expect much will change about Boot Camp.

    As always, though, feel free to disagree, as I know some of you will.



    Share
    | Print This Article Print This Article

    7 Responses to “The Leopard Report: Will Boot Camp Change?”

    1. Matt Carrell says:

      Apple isn’t going to pursue virtualization to install windows.. REMEMBER: The EULA from Microsoft on Vista forbids virtualization.. so that ain’t gonna happen.

    2. Apple isn’t going to pursue virtualization to install windows.. REMEMBER: The EULA from Microsoft on Vista forbids virtualization.. so that ain’t gonna happen.

      Actually, it is prohibited only on the Home versions. It’s OK for the Business versions of Vista. In saying that, it doesn’t mean you can’t install the Home version — there is no installation lock that I know of. But if you want to obey Microsoft’s EULA precisely as it’s worded, you go Business.

      Peace,
      Gene

    3. Steve W says:

      Given that Parallels and VMWare already exist, if I were Apple, then I would be working to perfect MacWine.

    4. Given that Parallels and VMWare already exist, if I were Apple, then I would be working to perfect MacWine.

      I hardly see the need for that, since that purpose is already served by a third-party product, CrossOver Mac, and it’s questionable how long it would take to reverse-engineer APIs for a decent number of apps. More to the point, I don’t think Apple wants to get in the business of doing that sort of thing in order to allow someone to run Windows software without Windows.

      Boot Camp, with its dual-booting limitation, performs extremely well, and it shouldn’t need any refinements beyond improved drivers where necessary and perhaps a speedier reboot option.

      Peace,
      Gene

    5. Craig Gorsuch says:

      Personally, I believe the Apple is looking for a way for Leopard to run Windows binaries from the Boot Camp partition without running Windows itself. Absolutely no proof of this, but it’s a fun thing to speculate about.

    6. Matt Carrell says:

      Actually, it is prohibited only on the Home versions. It’s OK for the Business versions of Vista. In saying that, it doesn’t mean you can’t install the Home version — there is no installation lock that I know of. But if you want to obey Microsoft’s EULA precisely as it’s worded, you go Business.

      Peace,
      Gene

      Not that I really care what M$’s ELUA tries to cram down my throat, because they aren’t about to sue end users, but it will have some impact on any ideas Apple, Inc. has about virtualization. Most home users aren’t gonna be happy to pay the extra $100 more for a business edition over the cost of Home: Basic Edition. People who are migrating right now are mostly coming from XP anyways I would imagine. In the coming year or so when people start dumping Vista systems, would it be Apple, Inc’s responsibility to ensure that people couldn’t use virtualization under Vista on a Mac or do they leave it on the end user to determine the legality of doing so?

    7. John Davidson says:

      I use Boot Camp because the MacBook Pro is extremely good hardware to run Win XP on. I often have a number of VMs running under XP to simulate an Active Directory LAN with a number of servers including one running SMS and a second server .running CMDB software in SQL Server 2000. This means there is a third server acting as the Domain Controller. This setup may have a full lab of demonstration PCs connected.

      This has run flawlessly since the first beta release of Boot Camp.

      I have seriously considered buying another MacBook Pro so that one can be dedicated to Win XP and the second to OS X.

    Leave Your Comment