• Explore the magic and the mystery!
  • The Tech Night Owl's Home Page
  • Namecheap.com





  • Living with Leopard: Book IV — Spaces, Spaces and More Spaces

    November 1st, 2007

    I feel real lucky to be using a 30-inch display, because I need lots of space on my screen with which to get work done. Now I have to tell you that the first Mac I brought into my home (after working at an office with one for several years) came with the famous Apple 13-inch color display. But I felt constrained, because I couldn’t even place the contents of a single page in a document on the screen without reducing its size to near unreadability.

    I recall that I found a system extension in those days that hacked the graphic drivers to stretch the screen slightly, to eliminate most of the telltale black border of a CRT. Sure, I could buy a larger display, but if you think today’s 30-inch models are expensive, double that price to get a 19-inch circa 1990.

    Over the years, software developers have come up with “virtual desktop” software that would compartmentalize your application windows into separate locations, which you could switch to with a keystroke. Some content creators with a larger budget than I had at the time just bought multiple monitors and rejoiced in being able to put QuarkXPress on the left display and Adobe Photoshop on the right.

    Well, the multiple desktop software really didn’t impress me, so I just used utilities that would automatically hide the applications you weren’t working in. Under Mac OS X, there’s AutoHide, a freebie, and a shareware variant, HideIt Control. But, as I said, they were limited to displaying a single application unless you held down a special key, usually Shift, when you switched to another application. That would allow both to occupy the same screen real estate.

    In loading up on features for Leopard, Apple took the virtual desktop idea and ran with it, coming up with Spaces. Because it’s built into the system, you don’t have to contend with possible incompatibilities. Even better, they’ve made it so simple to configure and so smooth in operation that once you’ve used Spaces, you’ll never go back.

    To get started, just open the Exposé & Spaces preference panel and click on the Spaces tab. From here, you’ll see a grid of four virtual desktops. You can add up to 16 by clicking the available plus signs in the Rows and Columns field. Applications can be attached to a single space or all spaces.

    My initial setup took maybe three or four minutes. From then on, when I click on an application’s icon in the Dock or launch it, I’m automatically switched to the appropriate desktop in a fancy visual flourish, typical of Apple. It all happens in a flash, even quicker than those application hiding utilities. I’m impressed.

    In my situation, I configured spaces by category, and I suspect that will represent the most common setup scheme. The applications I use to produce my radio shows reside on one desktop, writing in another, browsing in a third, plus separate screens for iChat, Mail and the rest.

    In all, I configured 12 Spaces environments, and, after using it a while, I moved applications from one to the other until, as they say in the fairy tale, everything was just right.

    If you have forgotten where you’ve placed things, and that’s understandable, the F8 keystroke will invoke all of your chosen desktops in a single screen, in an Exposé-style layout, and you can drag and drop your applications to the appropriate location. A quick perusal of Apple’s Help menu will provide more options and shortcuts for Spaces, so I urge you to look it over and consider the various possibilities. Even though Spaces is easy to use, it is quite sophisticated in its execution, as you’ll learn soon enough.

    In regular use, Spaces is pretty benign. Other than the visual effect, you hardly know it’s running. It’s not quite trouble-free, however. In some situations, I’ll move to a new desktop while an application is launching, and it’ll suddenly appear in the wrong place. I’ve also run into a situation on several occasions where switching to an application delivers a blank desktop, with no windows on display. Annoying? You bet.

    I’ve duplicated this troubling symptom on a PowerPC and Intel-based Mac, so I suspect I’m either doing something wrong or too quickly — and I have no idea what — or there is a bug in Spaces that Apple needs to address. I’m voting for the latter.

    There are two solutions, other than simply restarting your Mac. One is to bring up the Spaces Exposé display with the F8 shortcut, and click on the desktop you want. That step doesn’t eliminate the problem; it just allows you to bypass it. The other step does zap the symptoms, and it involves going to the Utilities folder, and launching Activity Monitor.

    With Activity Monitor running, select Dock, choose Quit Process from the application’s window and select Quit from the confirmation dialog. Your Dock will disappear and restart itself, after which Spaces will behave normally. Yes, Spaces is, like Dashboard, connected to the Dock.

    I’m sure some of the Mac troubleshooting sites will make a huge deal of this singular problem, but I regard it as minor, and the fix is trivial. More to the point, there will be that inevitable 10.5.1 update before long, where I’ve little doubt that this and perhaps other Leopard issues will be resolved.

    Regardless, I love Spaces. And I’ve retired all of those auto-hiding utilities for good.



    Share
    | Print This Article Print This Article

    5 Responses to “Living with Leopard: Book IV — Spaces, Spaces and More Spaces”

    1. Dana Sutton says:

      For the past couple of years I’ve been using a commercial virtual desktop program, which is still better than Spaces in at least two ways. First, suppose you have a desktop reserved for the novel you’re writing, and another for general purposes, and suppose that you want to leave your Word files for your novel open and meanwhile use Word to write a letter to a friend in the second desktop space. My other program allows you to have different windows belonging to the same program open in different desktops. Admittedly, it’s got some stability problems about remembering window placement that the developers have never quite got around to solving, but at least their engineers anticipated that some users would have this need. Apple didn’t, and I think they really blew it here. Second, the commercial program allows to assign a different desktop pattern to each desktop, which is a very helpful visual cue to have a separate style for each desktop.

    2. Richard Mossman says:

      Just as some history, X-Windows desktops have had a very similar capability for many years. My HP-UX workstation (circa 1998) can be configured with either four or eight workspaces.

      You navigate between them by clicking on a button (that you can click on and rename).

      It too has the problem where I start an application or open a window in one workspace, then quickly jump to another workspace and have the app or window open there instead. Then you have to go into the workspace “manager” and move the window/app back to the workspace you originally intended or it’s actually possible to have the same window in two places. You can’t close the window in one workspace without closing it in the other. But, you can tell the WS manager to only show it in one workspace.

      Basically, Spaces isn’t an entirely new concept. It too has been around in one implementation or another for a while. But, as with most things “Apple”, this is a new, fresh, and well implemented version.

      Gee, I just hope I haven’t given some company a reason to sue Apple! 😎

    3. Nobody needs an excuse to sue Apple. There are plenty of candidates trolling for action, and attorneys to take their cases. 😀

      Peace,
      Gene

    4. Stan says:

      Yeah, Apple was never really a company that is known for making original ideas. Probably a company known for stealing original ideas and executing them well.

    5. Yeah, Apple was never really a company that is known for making original ideas. Probably a company known for stealing original ideas and executing them well.

      Stealing? That may be a bit of a stretch. More like knowing when and where to buy technology and how to package it.

      Peace,
      Gene

    Leave Your Comment