The WWDC Report #3: Is Snow Leopard An Admission that Leopard is Flawed?

June 10th, 2008

In Mac OS X’s relatively brief history, it was a sure thing that each new version would be replete with whizzy new features in addition to the normal range of under-the-hood enhancements. This all reached a peak with 10.5, where Apple boasted over 300 new or improved features.

However, Leopard’s stability appears to be a mixed bag. While my experiences are, by and large, extremely favorable, you don’t have to spend much time with Google to locate a spate of complaints about one thing or another. In fact, there are reports that a 10.5.4 update is being rushed out soon to address problems created by 10.5.3.

So far all the speculation about 10.6 had it that it will carry the baggage of another few hundred new features, but Apple has taken a different tack. Snow Leopard is meant to be a leaner, meaner beast, and compelling new features are few. The one that seems most significant for the business user is native support for Microsoft Exchange 2007, which will allow Mail, Address Book and iCal to be full citizens in that environment.

That is largely an extension of the capabilities arriving soon in iPhone 2.0 in the wake of Apple’s licensing of Microsoft’s ActiveSync technology. In fact, you have to wonder whether there’s as much of a need for Office for the Mac now that one of its key features is becoming a part of Mac OS X, and file translation of Office documents works fairly well in iWork ’08.

Now maybe Microsoft realizes this, but if they can sell more hugely-expensive Exchange packages to businesses who are embracing Macs and iPhones in increasing numbers, they may still gain decent profits from the experience.

The one sour note for Microsoft, however, is that Apple is going to be incorporating its push technology not just in the cloud, with its new MobileMe service, but in Snow Leopard Server. It won’t cost a dime extra, which means that something to match Exchange’s industrial-strength groupware capabilities will be available from Apple for a far lower price, just by buying its server operating system. That, by the way, comes free (with unlimited seats to boot) with the purchase of an Xserve.

In Apple’s brief information on the client version of Snow Leopard, they also talk of enhanced support for multicore processors, which means that those super-powerful 8-core Mac Pro workstations will have more to do when you’re engaged in heavy-duty number crunching. Right now, the performance boost from these Intel Xeon processors isn’t as high as you might expect, and is sometimes barely perceptible. Of course developers will have to do their part to harness these enhanced capabilities.

Rounding out the lineup is OpenCL, which will offload more processing chores to your Mac’s graphics chip, and QuickTime X, said to be a major rewrite and streamlining of Apple’s multimedia technology.

Although developers who attend the WWDC are being given a Snow Leopard preview, the details are under the usual confidentiality agreements, and thus you’ll get mostly snippets about what’s happening. It’s still an open question, for example, whether 10.6 will retain support for PowerPC Macs, although it’s likely you’ll still have Rosetta to run older applications on Intel models.

Right now, Snow Leopard is due in “about a year,” meaning roughly the summer of 2009, perhaps to coincide with the next WWDC. However, there’s enough wiggle room to extend that date to the fall, or even a Macworld 2010 debut.

If it’s Intel-only, it’ll deliver great benefits to Apple, because they can strip the binaries of PowerPC code and make the files a whole lot slimmer. No more 450MB updates. They can also work harder to optimize performance and even exorcise a whole lot more bugs a lot faster, because they’ll be able to do their Q&A testing on fewer models.

As for PowerPC users, in the middle of 2009 there will be a lot more Intel Macs in use than those still running boxes with the older chips, and the youngest legacy models will be at least three years old. That’s timeframe is a little light in terms of Apple’s previous policies, and it might be a controversial move if it’s followed. Should Snow Leopard slip to early 2010, though, the psychological impact won’t be near as serious.

However, since 10.6 will be largely a bug fix and enhancement release, I dare say Apple shouldn’t assume they can get away with charging the full $129 retail price for a copy. Unlike a feature upgrade, it should have at most a token charge, say $19 or, at worst, $39, for a copy for existing 10.5 users. Only those upgrading from scratch would have to pay the full retail price.

Even better, I really think Apple would do right by its customers to make 10.6 a free download. That would certainly be a welcome gift, particularly for those who have embraced Mac OS X through bad times and good for so many years. It’s not as if Apple’s profits would suffer seriously, and it would make great PR.

Windows 7? What’s that?

| Print This Article Print This Article

10 Responses to “The WWDC Report #3: Is Snow Leopard An Admission that Leopard is Flawed?”

  1. Dana Sutton says:

    Well of course Leopard is flawed. With Apple’s policy of “perpetual beta” no OS they issue is entirely problem-free. Problem is, we tend to compare the performance of a new OS in the early stages of its life-cycle, when bugs are most visible, with its predecessor at the end of its cycle, after a whole lot of bugfix releases have ironed out most of its problems.

  2. Steve Riggins says:

    Yes Leopard is flawed, as is every other single piece of software anyone has used.

    Apple is being brave and smart by taking a breather and getting things better under the hood. This will allow them to lay the groundwork for much more fantastic Apple software to come.

  3. Dave Barnes says:

    I just don’t get this bitching about the as-yet-unannounced price of $129 for Snow Leopard.
    A family pack is typically $180 at Amazon. I own 5 Macs. So, Snow Leopard would be $36 per machine.
    Sounds reasonable to me.

  4. Bluejade says:

    Don’t forget about the ZF. The Snow Leopard Server certainly has it. I would expect it would be in the Snow Leopard Client as well.

    I thing of Snow Leopard as a streamlined Leopard on steroids running on a range of products.

    Looks like good time to upgrade from my old trustworthy G4 Cube running Tiger : )

  5. wtfk says:


  6. John says:

    Is Leopard flawed relative to what? Flawed relative to Tiger or Panther or Jaguar or Cheetah? No. Flawed relative to Snow Leopard or 10.7 or 10.8? Yes.

    Software evolves. It’s not surprising that the next version is improved over the current one, and the current one is improved over the previous one.

    OTOH, if you’re asking did Leopard ship too early and with too many bugs? Yes!! Apple should have waited another 4-5 months. By comparison, Tiger was a much smoother upgrade. But Leopard has more features and after it stabilized Leopard was an improvement to (and therefore less flawed than) Tiger.

  7. ToWS says:

    The ‘Power PC computers will only be three years old when the Snow Leopard arrives’ argument is beside the point. Snow Leopard will, with some very minor exceptions as noted, be exactly the same as Leopard; that’s the point of it. Users of both systems will have the same experience: they will both be running Leopard. OK we geeks will want to have the Snow prefix but normal users simply won’t care.
    When the next version with new features (Lion, king of the beasts?) rolls around, say 18 months later, then the Power PC machines will be coming on for five years old, and even the most powerful G5s will be looking very long in the tooth.
    In short, Snow Leopard is a stroke of genius. A chance to take stock, regroup and reform whilst the enemy is winded. The code that comes from the rewriting process should be lean, clean and mean. I can’t wait, it’s a win-win for us all. Once again Apple is using an economic recession period to innovate. Now, can anyone persuade Adobe that CS5 (it’s already too late for CS4) should be treated to the same process?

  8. David H Dennis says:

    The name, Snow Leopard, being very close to the previous version Leopard seems to send a message that it’s not a big deal. That makes me think Gene is right, that this will be a cheaper upgrade than Leopard.

    Or they may not push upgrades at all, since it’s meant for new machines – buy a new system and have Snow Leopard included but don’t bother upgrading. But at the same time, no new applications would require it.

    That doesn’t sound right, though, because this emphasis on concurrency means freshly written software would only run under the new version.

    It really seems like a puzzling decision since I would think few would buy what appears on the surface to be a bug fix upgrade. So why isn’t it 10.5.something?


  9. Jim says:

    I wouldn’t count on Snow Leopard including Rosetta… the whole point is to leave legacy stuff behind!

  10. I wouldn’t count on Snow Leopard including Rosetta… the whole point is to leave legacy stuff behind!

    There are too many apps that aren’t Universal-aware. Lots of people, for example, still use Office 2004, because the 2008 edition lost support for Visual Basic for Applications. I can see dropping Classic support, but I think Rosetta will carry on for another release or two.


Leave Your Comment