• Explore the magic and the mystery!
  • The Tech Night Owl's Home Page
  • Namecheap.com





  • So Where Are The Missing Apple Desktops?

    January 13th, 2009

    All right, so we know that Apple doesn’t really like trade shows, and I’m sure some of you feel that maybe this year’s announcements were toned down and Steve Jobs pulled from their final keynote to send a message to you and, of course, to the folks who run the Macworld Expo.

    While I don’t necessarily subscribe to this sort of conspiracy theory, one nagging issue is that Apple clearly felt constrained to deliver knockout products in January of each year, whether or not it had something actually ready or not. That contributed to the perception — and again it may simply not be true — that there was a little too much rushing to market as a result. So perhaps the first iteration of Intel-based Apple note-books should have been postponed a couple of months to allow Apple’s design team to fix a few defects, such as running a little too hot, and, of course, that case malformation problem that afflicted early MacBooks.

    While Apple is now liberated from having to adhere to someone else’s release schedule, the question arises: Where is the stillborn iMac upgrade? What about the Mac mini? Will it get its long deserved refresh, or just be consigned to the remainder rack for the ones still in stock after it’s discontinued?

    I’d rather take the optimistic approach to the Mac mini and speculate that it will get a major upgrade, not just with speedier parts, but perhaps a case redesign. Not that there’s much wrong with what you have now. Indeed that form factor paved the way for the AirPort Extreme and Time Capsule, so it’s clear Apple isn’t quite ready to give it up. But that won’t stop them from making changes, perhaps significant ones.

    But even if the new mini resembles the old rather closely, I will make my pitch all over again for a revision to the RAM and hard drive upgrade schemes. Putty knives and other implements are clunky, and clumsy, and you risk minor damage to the case even in the best of circumstances. I still don’t understand why a few simple recessed screws at the bottom of the case would be so objectionable, but maybe I don’t have the sensibilities of a Steve Jobs or Jonathan Ive, so I’m just not capable of knowing elegance when I see it.

    If you can call that elegance.

    Another possibility is that perhaps Apple might consider merging the Mac mini with the poor-selling Apple TV and create something that will serve the purpose of both products. So you’d have a device that can work just fine as a personal computer, but can also double as a media center and perhaps even a server for the rest of your network. Three products in one, and certainly, if Apple can keep the prices at the present levels, at $599 for the base model and $799 for the top-of-the-line, it might create some fascinating new sales possibilities.

    When it comes to the iMac, I suppose that there’s really not much need for major revisions externally. The current form factor is not that old and, in fact, heavily influenced the latest generation of Mac note-books. The internal workings might perhaps mirror the MacBook Pro lineup, with perhaps a few extra frills.

    If Apple isn’t interested in delivering a headless midrange tower — an iMac without the display — maybe they can perform a few tweaks on the chassis of the iMac to allow for installation of a second hard drive and perhaps a doubling of the number of RAM slots. Both modifications might not cost a whole lot to engineer, or increase the price of raw materials, so it could be that Apple would be able to keep the retail price unchanged.

    Some of the rumors and speculators are also suggesting that Apple might also use one of those snazzy mobile-based quad-core processors from Intel. That might be a way to really make the iMac into a powerhouse. Sure, it has the potential to cannibalize sales somewhat from the Mac Pro, but that product appeals mostly to a class of Mac content creators who require maximum power and maximum expandability. So the impact might not be so severe.

    On the other hand, an iMac on steroids might also attract more Windows switchers, for whom midrange desktops are the computers of choice. Moreover, since a large number of customers are actually going for note-books anyway, this proposed enhanced iMac might be the ideal compromise solution and might continue to sell in great volumes.

    So far as a netbook alternative from Apple, I still envision that as a Pro version of the iPhone and/or iPod touch, and that would provide a far more viable alternative than just a crippled MacBook. The PC makers are going with the latter approach, with netbooks that are basically smaller note-book computers with fewer features, and that, to me, demonstrates zero innovation.

    And, of course, we’re all waiting for a new 30-inch Apple display, based on the new LED-based design, but it would be nice to bundle the DVI adapter, so you don’t have to spend another $99 for extra cables just to hook it up.

    When is this all going to happen? Well, it doesn’t seem as if Apple cares much about anniversaries, so perhaps they’ll show up whenever they’re ready, and that’s probably late January or early February.



    Share
    | Print This Article Print This Article

    8 Responses to “So Where Are The Missing Apple Desktops?”

    1. Steve Mishket says:

      My 867-G4 is getting very long in the tooth. I’ve been waiting for 8 or 9 months for an upgrade to the Mac Pro tower. Is there any chance of that coming soon? I hate to trade down to an iMac. Some of us just prefer a desktop unit. If I do trade down do you have any suggestions for my perfectly good (great) 24″ Cinema Display?

      Thanks,

      Steve Mishket

    2. Steve W says:

      Yeah, other Steve, you can use your 24″ as a second monitor for you iMac. They can handle that now.

    3. Steve W says:

      “…it doesn’t seem as if Apple cares much about anniversaries…”

      D’uh! It would hypocritical for Apple to rush out some product in time for an anniversary, less than a month after dropping out of MacWorld ….

    4. Al says:

      The more I think about it, the more I am convinced that a headless iMac will never ever see the light of day.

      Apple really doesn’t want to encourage an internal upgrade ecosystem. This is just a recipe for increased tech support demands because “I installed accessory card X and now my Mac isn’t working right”. Once you get a critical mass of people complaining that their Macs are just a source of headaches (doesn’t matter who’s fault it is), then that gets to be part of the folklore surrounding Macs. And once established, product folklore is very hard to dispel. Just ask the big three. I don’t think Apple wants their brand name to be burdened with that.

    5. Steve W wrote:

      “…it doesn’t seem as if Apple cares much about anniversaries…”

      D’uh! It would hypocritical for Apple to rush out some product in time for an anniversary, less than a month after dropping out of MacWorld ….

      It would. Whatever they do announce will just be part of a normal product introduction.

      Peace,
      Gene

    6. Noel McRae says:

      I was very disappointed with MacWorld. Not that I will not benefit from the upgrades to iWork and iLife, but I have been waiting for a real upgrade to the iMac. Some of the early speculation was maybe a new iMac and mini. I was hoping. Sigh.

      I am still doing fairly well with my G5, but a couple of my newer software upgrades require the intel chip. Thus, I disappointed with MacWorldt. I am not one of the gamers or power users. I publish several small newsletters and the iMac is great for a retired Mac user. I have neither the money, room, nor the skill to justify more than the iMac. For me it is a perfect machine.

      I have my money all saved, but will wait longer. I am not a patient waiter, however.

    7. adam says:

      Al wrote:

      The more I think about it, the more I am convinced that a headless iMac will never ever see the light of day.

      Apple really doesn’t want to encourage an internal upgrade ecosystem. This is just a recipe for increased tech support demands because “I installed accessory card X and now my Mac isn’t working right”. Once you get a critical mass of people complaining that their Macs are just a source of headaches (doesn’t matter who’s fault it is), then that gets to be part of the folklore surrounding Macs. And once established, product folklore is very hard to dispel. Just ask the big three. I don’t think Apple wants their brand name to be burdened with that.

      This is a very astute observation. One of the problems Apple experienced in the Time Of The Clones was hardware incompatibility. I t wasn’t terribly unusual for a Genius Bar client with a Power Mac (G3 through MacPro) to come in concerned about their repeated crashes only to have the problem resolved down to a PCI card. Inevitably they would be happy that the solution was simple but frustrated at the inability to use the card they wanted. Anyway you slice it a frustrated customer is still frustrated. There are Mac compatible cards for most tasks you would need a card for, but not every card works well. Of course Windows users could have told them this. Adam

    8. David says:

      Steve Mishket:

      The Mac Pro is held up by a parts delay.
      Intel originally planned to release the 2-way capable Xeon version of the new Core i7 processor (and related chipset) in November 2008, but moved the date to February/March 2009 in response to the recession. Apple is likely to be one of the first users of the new chips once they are available so you don’t have too much longer to wait.

      I hope new consumer desktops arrive before then because my wife is eager to replace our liquid cooled G5 before it decides to spring a leak.

    Leave Your Comment