Rumors About New Apple Gear and the Consquences

May 22nd, 2012

Without letup, the rumors persist that Apple plans to boost the size of the iPhone’s display when a new model is introduced this fall. A few sites have begun to consider the consequences of that change, should it occur. But it’s not that Apple normally looks backwards when changing products, which is why the cases for iPods, iPhones and iPads would be rendered obsolete by a major case redesign.

But the current iPhone design first appeared in 2010, so changing it in the fall of 2012 isn’t as disrupting as it might have been if the iPhone 4s became the iPhone 5. Accessory makers have had plenty of time to profit from the existing designs. The real issue is how developers would be impacted should the next iPhone receive a larger display.

Now the cheap way out would be to just reduce the space above and below the screen, keep the case the same size, but increase the display’s diagonal measurement to four inches. That’s the cheap way out, and I don’t think Apple would play that game because it would represent far too much of a change for existing iPhone apps. The move to the Retina Display was mostly one of adding higher resolution artwork, but otherwise allowing apps to be the same visible size.

Once the screen ratio changes from 3:2 to something else, even if it makes widescreen videos look prettier, developers have to redesign apps to conform. They’d either have to build a “universal” version to accommodate both sizes, or provide a separate downloadable version, a so-called “large display” variation. Apple would be encouraging a level of fragmentation, shades of Android. To be fair, the Android situation is far, far worse, but I’d like to think that Apple doesn’t want to go there.

Instead, a larger iPhone display, should it happen, will likely retain the same 3:2 ratio. It would require careful redesign to keep the case from growing too large. It’s even possible that Apple might be constrained to choose something less than four inches, say 3.75 inches, which would at least satisfy some of the people who demand a larger iPhone screen. The key here is convenience and portability. You shouldn’t be forced to don a clown uniform to fit an iPhone in your pants pocket. Unfortunately, product reviewers, such as Consumer Reports magazine, don’t concentrate on such potential shortcomings in giving a smartphone a favorable rating. And forget about a 3D screen, please!

When it comes to the next generation of Mac note-books, the predictions go beyond just ditching the optical drive, which makes perfect sense, so long as external drives remain an option. Instead, some prognosticators are announcing the death of FireWire and Ethernet. If you want either, there will always be an adaptor for the Thunderbolt port. While I cannot predict what Apple will do, today’s MacBook Pros are used in workflows that require high-speed wired networks and FireWire. Keeping these ports shouldn’t affect the case size and weight of the final product, so why inconvenience people? The MacBook Air is clearly intended towards mostly portable use.

The predictions also talk of USB 3.0, which is backwards compatible to older USB versions, but I’ve seen scant mention of the emerging 802.11ac Wi-Fi standard, which will afford networking speeds that, according to the Wikipedia entry, “enable multi-station WLAN throughput of at least 1 Gigabit per second.” In other words, on a par with gigabit Ethernet. With computers and routers capable of supporting the standard — and a few routers are already available — the need for Ethernet will diminish. Or maybe Apple would consider moving to 10Gb Ethernet, although the hardware is still pretty expensive.

There are also the hardware configurations that some suggest Apple will discontinue. First there’s the 17-inch MacBook Pro. Yes, I gather that sales aren’t near as high as the 15-inch model, but a lot of content creators require the larger MacBook Pros for studio work in the field. People like me still want the larger screen, but it’s all about Apple’s commitment to that audience despite low sales.

The same concerns apply to the Mac Pro. The newest Xeon chips are shipping, and it would cost relatively little for Apple to develop a new model with faster processors, USB 3.0, Thunderbolt, and all the other goodies. Apple makes huge profits from the fully-outfitted Mac Pros, so there seems little incentive not to keep them available.

Sure, I suppose that Apple could amaze us all and deliver a Mac Pro in a new dress, ditching that butt-ugly cheese grater cabinet in exchange for something slim and elegant. Just the other day, I was helping a colleague resolve some problems with Final Cut Pro on a 2006 Mac Pro. As I lugged the thing down the stairs to his car, once again I was reminded of the fact that this is one overweight beast in serious need of a diet.

Now speaking of consequences, as Microsoft decides how much to charge for Windows 8, I wonder how they’d react of Apple makes Mountain Lion free. We already have the iOS precedent, and the move would encourage Mac users to upgrade real fast. It’s a sure thing Apple doesn’t have to worry so much about lost profits, but making Microsoft freak as they attempt to find a competitive price for Windows 8 would be a most enjoyable way to spend a summer.

| Print This Article Print This Article

3 Responses to “Rumors About New Apple Gear and the Consquences”

  1. Richard says:

    I have seen the larger screened smartphones. If Apple does not increase the size of the screen it would, IMO, be a big, big mistake. The larger screen makes all the difference in the world in the readability of text and so on. There is simply no comparison.

    Changing form factors will not be “disruptive’ as you speculate it might be. It is time for a case redesign anyway. Check the trend. Every two years Apple have made changes, with a little bit of a refresh in between. It’s time.

    One of the consequences of a larger screen would be “more space”. Even with a smaller form factor dock connector and other such things (including the super small SIM card), there is a need for more battery space, among other things.

    I dearly wish that Apple would wake up to the reality that people want a micro-SD card slot to put various things assortment of movies, a different play set for iTunes, transferring documents or whatever. It is past time to focus on functionality more than how small Jonny can make it and still have the thing work after a fashion.

    If the iPhone 5 (or whatever it may be called) does not implement 4G, it will be goodbye iPhone for me. AT&T keeps reminding me that it is available in my area and the many benefits of it…3G just is not that fast.

    The question in my mind, however, is not whether Apple is going to do these things (OK, probably not the micro SD card), but when they will get around to releasing the darned thing. Apple are reported to be trying to get back on an annual schedule, but I won’t be at all surprised if a year comes and goes without the new model.

    • @Richard, LTE is a given. The real issue is whether Apple changes the screen ratio on the larger iPhone. If they do, that can cause disruption to developers unless there was an easy coding trick to address the issue.


  2. Richard says:


    I am no code monkey, but I really don’t see it being that big a deal to accommodate a different screen resolution, size or format/ratio. In any event, it simply needs to be done. Go into one of the cell provider stores and play around with one of the Galaxy series of phones. I suspect you will find using a larger screen to be a revelation. Add to that the continuing rumors of a better class of screen (it is unclear whether Apple are working on this for the next phone or the one after it) and there is plenty to look forward to in the way of visual presentation.


Leave Your Comment