• Explore the magic and the mystery!
  • The Tech Night Owl's Home Page
  • Namecheap.com





  • Google’s Eric Schmidt Loses Touch of Reality

    November 26th, 2013

    Not long ago, Eric Schmidt, late of Apple’s board of directors and the present executive chairman at Google, made the silly claim, at a public event no less, than Android was more secure than iOS. Well, perhaps that was his profound belief, though it bought nothing but laughter from the audience. You could almost feel that Schmidt had become the politician who sticks to ridiculous talking points regardless of the facts.

    Well, it appears that Schmidt is at it again, this time pretending that loads of iPhone users are rushing to move from iOS to Android. So he writes, “many of my iPhone friends are converting to Android. The latest high-end phones from Samsung (Galaxy S4), Motorola (Verizon Droid Ultra) and the Nexus 5 (for AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile) have better screens, are faster, and have a much more intuitive interface. They are a great Christmas present to an iPhone user!”

    Or is that the equivalent of putting a brick in your Christmas stocking?

    As with his bizarre comments about the Android security situation, Schmidt is imagining situations that don’t exist when it comes to the iPhone compared to his preferred handsets. Now I don’t dispute his contention that “many of his friends are converting to Android.” Perhaps he limits his association to people who aren’t using iPhones, or are leaving the platform for some reason. In the real world, several times as many people leave Android for the iPhone than vice versa.

    While claims of a “much more intuitive interface” are subjective, it’s clear that the iPhone 5s is usually faster than the speediest high-end Android phones, such as the Samsung Galaxy S4. I’m sure many of you are aware of Samsung’s software trick, which hotrods (overclocks) the S4 processor when certain benchmark apps are run. Talk about cheating. What’s more, Android lags seriously on lesser hardware. Even on the fastest smartphones, screen movement proceeds in tiny jerks, rather than smoothly, as on almost any Apple mobile gadget.

    The claim of “better screens” may be true if you consider display size. If you consider how, say, a Galaxy S4 works in sunlight, the answer is that it doesn’t. The AMOLED screen is totally washed out. At least the iPhone is visible. Not super bright by any means, but visible and usable.

    Or maybe Schmidt has joined the editors of Consumer Reports in testing these things indoors. Maybe he just doesn’t get out much.

    Now obviously what Schmidt says is meant as corporate spin. Google wants you to believe Android and Android handsets are superior to the iPhone. While Android sales trump the iPhone, no single model sells more than Apple. And 70% of those Android sales are for low-end crap, which doesn’t do much to show off the best the platform can deliver. Handset makers don’t make any profits from these sales either, although some businesses are merely happy to have decent cash flow I suppose.

    In any case, Schmidt’s occasional flights of fancy are far tamer than what you’ve heard from outgoing Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer over the years. He dismissed the iPhone and the iPad as being, for all intents and purposes, irrelevant. But Microsoft hasn’t been able to do much with Windows Phone, and the Surface tablet has yet to find a market. Sure, Ballmer can gloat over the clear success of the Xbox One, and it does appear to be a credible upgrade for the company’s gaming console.

    But Microsoft is still facing some strong headwinds in trying to keep Windows, Office and Windows Phone relevant. Apple’s decision to make the iWork office suite, and OS X Mavericks for that matter, free, has really put the screws to Microsoft. It’s not that the company can give away software that drives most of their income, although Microsoft Office will remain the standard bearer in businesses regardless of the purchase price. Here Google Docs is probably the most serious competitor, for many businesses have decided that they don’t need to pay a bundle for productivity apps. Regardless, Microsoft loses.

    As to Google, I wonder just how much attention Android is earning these days. Having the number one mobile platform may sound really nice as a marketing talking point, but it has not delivered huge stacks of cash to the company. People who buy cheap Android handsets are not inclined to actually pay anything for apps, which doesn’t help developers, or enhance Google’s commission for sales from the Google Play store.

    Even though distribution of the latest Android, 4.4 KitKat, is expanding, hundreds of millions of Android handsets and tablets will never receive that upgrade.

    But I wonder if Schmidt cares. Besides, I expect he’s smart enough to know that his silly remarks about Android security and what makes the best mobile gadget stocking stuffer are nothing more than market speak. It’s not as if he is going to suddenly admit that Apple still has the better platform, and still earns far more profit than all those hundreds of millions of Android gadgets deliver to Google. I only wonder why anyone is taking him seriously, that’s all.



    Share
    | Print This Article Print This Article

    12 Responses to “Google’s Eric Schmidt Loses Touch of Reality”

    1. javaholic says:

      Eric Schmidt, like Steve Ballmer – always a great source of entertainment.

    2. Ted Schroedeer says:

      Why Jobs trusted Schmidt, I’ll never know.

    3. Matthew says:

      Doesn’t Mr. Schmidt still use a Blackberry?

    4. Don108 says:

      I doubt he actually wrote it. It reads like something written by a marketing hack.

    5. AdamC says:

      @ted schrodeer

      Jobs was using Schmidt.

    6. Peter says:

      In the real world, several times as many people leave Android for the iPhone than vice versa.

      Citation?

    7. cotten999 says:

      @Peter

      Apple’s growth in iOS is slowing because Apple’s user base is growing. iOS (like Mac OS X) is sticky. Once you are in, you will never leave because Apple has gazillions of happy customers (aka “fanboys”).

      So if you create a chart of new users vs existing users, you will see the existing users get bigger, but new users shrink and this number will eventually flatten out. The industry doesn’t take the installed base of users into consideration when they create market share numbers. They only look at new sales. Once a person is considered a new user in one quarter. he becomes an existing user in the next.

      Android, however, is a “throw away” platform. Most apps are free (infested with Google ads), and therefore there is little monetary investment by the consumer. Especially since most (80%) of Android’s devices are freebies. So there is nothing to keep a user to Android especially since just about all of Google’s spy ware (I mean, software), is available in iOS.

      Note also that EVERY other platform has at least one app in Apple’s App Store. Apple has ZERO apps in any other platform. You can get Google anything in iOS, Microsoft apps in iOS and even BlackBerry’s BBM is an iOS app, however you can’t get GarageBand, iTunes, iMovie, etc in any other store.

      That is a fact that can’t be argued with.

    8. cotten999 says:

      @Gene

      The iCloud versions of iWorks are only available if you have an iCloud account. In order to have an iCloud account you need an Apple ID. In order to have an Apple ID you need an iOS device.

      The iCloud versions of the apps do not reside on any device. In other words, you still need iWork apps on some device in order for you transfer the document onto a real device.

      Granted you can export a iWorks document into an Office document, but what is the point of creating an iWorks document if you are only using Office?

      • @cotten999, Not true. You can create an Apple ID by signing up for an Apple service, such as the iTunes Store or iCloud. You don’t have to buy an Apple branded device of any kind.

        Please check this support document on how to set up and use an Apple ID:

        http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5622

        The point of using iWork is to have a cheaper (or free) suite that provides a decent range of productivity tools that is also fairly compatible with Microsoft Office.

        Peace,
        Gene

    9. Vexxhost Recommendations

      The Tech Night Owl — Cutting-Edge Tech Commentary

    Leave Your Comment